<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>KyleHasegawa.com - Latest Comments in Is the New DiggBar Shortener Bad for Sharing LInks?</title><link>http://kylehasegawa.disqus.com/</link><description>KyleHasegawa.com</description><atom:link href="https://kylehasegawa.disqus.com/is_the_new_diggbar_shortener_bad_for_sharing_links/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:41:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is the New DiggBar Shortener Bad for Sharing LInks?</title><link>http://blog.kylehasegawa.com/node/1297#comment-7813158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. I hadn't noticed that about the links on the Digg front page but you're right.  I hope Digg modifies their handling of bots or the bots learn to recognize framed content and rank accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kylehase</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the New DiggBar Shortener Bad for Sharing LInks?</title><link>http://blog.kylehasegawa.com/node/1297#comment-7803945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The SEO value of getting to the front page of Digg has now left us?  The link you now get is to a digg shortened URL, not the link you had before.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Draper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:03:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>